Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Polling Forum
Trilogo accessories; miscard or intentional?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TK-7785" data-source="post: 504040" data-attributes="member: 8868"><p>Whilst I think that's true to the extent that that would explain true packaging errors or miscards (Friday afternoon packaging jobs) both Kenner and Palitoy as manufacturers would have had some assemblance of product consistency. They were manufacturers of quality toys not market stall rubbish. As such a product would have been brought to market in the way it was designed and to certain standards. After all, why were all (excluding oddities) of Luke X-Wings packaged with blue/black blasters and Luke Bespins with blue blasters throughout the entire production run across multiple card backs over many years. </p><p></p><p>Just look at all the surviving MOCs in existence, I'd wager 99% of any given figure that could have a variation of Imperial, Smuggler or Endor Blaster show consistency. Where are all the Squid Heads with blue Bespin blasters and Lobots with grey? Where are all the Waroks with Lumat's bow and vice versa (again, rare occasional oddities aside)? The examples deviating from this are truly in the minority and as such can be put down to packaging error. With respect the evidence just doesn't show that to be true.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TK-7785, post: 504040, member: 8868"] Whilst I think that's true to the extent that that would explain true packaging errors or miscards (Friday afternoon packaging jobs) both Kenner and Palitoy as manufacturers would have had some assemblance of product consistency. They were manufacturers of quality toys not market stall rubbish. As such a product would have been brought to market in the way it was designed and to certain standards. After all, why were all (excluding oddities) of Luke X-Wings packaged with blue/black blasters and Luke Bespins with blue blasters throughout the entire production run across multiple card backs over many years. Just look at all the surviving MOCs in existence, I'd wager 99% of any given figure that could have a variation of Imperial, Smuggler or Endor Blaster show consistency. Where are all the Squid Heads with blue Bespin blasters and Lobots with grey? Where are all the Waroks with Lumat's bow and vice versa (again, rare occasional oddities aside)? The examples deviating from this are truly in the minority and as such can be put down to packaging error. With respect the evidence just doesn't show that to be true. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Polling Forum
Trilogo accessories; miscard or intentional?
Top
Bottom