Would you still want Vintage if it cost a £1?

Wreck-It Ralph

Jedi Master
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
893
Someone asked me recently would you want a Ferrari if it cost a £1 which got me thinking about collecting. Why do you want certain collectibles, Grail items is it because it is expensive, would you still want them if they cost a £1?
 

Snaketibe

Grand Master
Supporter
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Messages
5,388
Location
United Kingdom
I collect Vintage Star Wars because I owned and loved it as a child, and I love it still. I've always said I wish it was all completely worthless and collected by nobody else, because then I could have it all. I've never been in this game for the money, and I don't think many true collectors are. Some people will always brag about what their collection is worth of course, but then some people are assholes :)
 

Wreck-It Ralph

Jedi Master
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
893
I wasn't so much focused on how much figures go up by, more what makes them desirable in the first place. Are some things desirable just because they are expensive and thereby unattainable e.g. MOC Palitoy VCJ would they still be desirable if they cost a £1 instead of £15,000+.
 

yoda

Sith Lord
Joined
Jan 10, 2015
Messages
1,905
Location
Ireland
Cost means nothing to me I am collecting for the love of it. It would be great if everything was £1 then I could finally own every figure. Unfortunately the way things have got I don't believe its possible for me now.
 

lejackal

Grand Master
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
8,508
It would be great if it was all a quid, I'd buy tons of it.......but if it was all a quid hardly anyone would be that worried about preservation so mocs would be getting opened left right and centre
 

SAVORY100

Sith Lord
Joined
May 29, 2014
Messages
4,186
Location
Wiltshire
In the case of the Ferrari... I'm no fan of Ferrari's anyway.. more of a Porsche 356 man myself; by all means throw one my way.. I'll give you a quid.

In the case of SW, value isn't at all important... I wish it were all cheaper. Having a collection is just that, a collection. It has nothing whatsoever to do with value. For me its about completing runs, making sets, getting something new and different to oggle at and enjoy. Funnily enough most of the super high priced items have less interest to me; maybe the price is a bit of a turn off, but they are often just not my thing. Sure if they were £1 I'd pick them up to complete the sets, but they are not something I aspire to owning due to their value.

In the modern sector, I buy Force Attax cards, they cost a £1 pack, I keep them as clean and mint as I can, file them, keep them perfect. The fact that the vintage is old, makes not difference to me. If I collect it I keep it as perfect as possible, no matter what the 'value'

I guess if value was all that was of interest I'd buy shares instead and look at a spreadsheet all day instead of my collecting room...
 

Mr-shifter

Sith Lord
Joined
Aug 25, 2013
Messages
2,996
Location
Sussex by the Sea
I have several items in my collection that cost a pound, and many more that cost less than £10.

Value is only relevant if I'm trying to buy something and if I can afford it. Outside of that, I collect items I like, irrelevant of wether they cost £1 or £1000.

I would rather everything was £1. It would make collecting a lot easier.
 

Richard_H

Grand Master
Joined
Aug 5, 2012
Messages
7,000
Location
Gateshead UK
Questions like this highlight the difference between colllector and investor. If the market crashes tomorrow and everything is worth £1 each it makes no difference to me other than I could buy more
 

edd_jedi

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
8,889
Location
UK
As others have said I wish it was cheaper than it is now, money does restrict my buying and means I'll probably never finish my trilogo run as I just can't justify thousands of pounds for a General Madine. That said part of the fun and enjoyment is definitely the hunt which is at least patrtly driven by money, if I could just walk in to a shop and buy these things at will there would be no buzz.

It's a shame that in Star Wars rare means money these days, I collect lots of other things like video games that come up far less often than some 'rare' or expensive Star Wars items, but sell for virtually nothing when they do.
 

peekaygee73

Sith Lord
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
1,027
I'm not sure I understand the logic behind the question - surely there aren't any collectors out there who purchase vintage Star Wars purely because it's not cheap? Or are we just talking about the 'big boys' out of whose way we need to move?! :wink: :lol:
 

Wreck-It Ralph

Jedi Master
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
893
Richard_H said:
Questions like this highlight the difference between colllector and investor. If the market crashes tomorrow and everything is worth £1 each it makes no difference to me other than I could buy more

Well I asked the question so does that immediately mean I am an investor, if I was to retract the question would that then mean I would become a collector again. I personally think the use of labels such as this is ugly and stops newer collectors such as myself from posting and entering into a meaningful discussion.
 

Wreck-It Ralph

Jedi Master
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
893
peekaygee73 said:
I'm not sure I understand the logic behind the question - surely there aren't any collectors out there who purchase vintage Star Wars purely because it's not cheap? Or are we just talking about the 'big boys' out of whose way we need to move?! :wink: :lol:

I am not sure whether there is any logic behind the question either I am just interested in whether price determines desirability. Most collectors have a grail item and most of these grail items are rare and expensive so why do we want these specific grail items is it because they are unattainable due to thier price and rarity?
 

ScruffyLookingNH

Sith Lord
Supporter
Joined
May 13, 2015
Messages
2,990
I'm having the most fun I've had in a long time putting a beater run of figures together having completed my complete loose set. The fact it's great fun and I'm trying to make sure I don't pay more than £2-3 per figure (Last 17 should be fun :lol:) sort of answers your question :)
 

edd_jedi

Moderator
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
Oct 19, 2006
Messages
8,889
Location
UK
I don't think Rich was aiming his comment at you asking the question, more peoples answers. I think you'll find we are all some split of collector and investor, although recently I've certainly seen a lot more people tipping towards the investor side. But vintage has never really been cheap - when I collected in the 90s yes you could buy a carded figure for £30 that would now cost £300, but £30 was a lot of money back then! I was at school so it would take me weeks to save up to buy each carded figure. I think my purchases back then probably cost me more in real terms when compared to how much I was earning (paper round and pocket money!)
 

SublevelStudios

Sith Lord
Joined
Oct 17, 2013
Messages
2,598
Wreck-It Ralph said:
Richard_H said:
Questions like this highlight the difference between colllector and investor. If the market crashes tomorrow and everything is worth £1 each it makes no difference to me other than I could buy more

Well I asked the question so does that immediately mean I am an investor, if I was to retract the question would that then mean I would become a collector again. I personally think the use of labels such as this is ugly and stops newer collectors such as myself from posting and entering into a meaningful discussion.

I agree, pretty sure Rich wasn't having a pop at you personally, just highlighting that there seems to be a focus at the moment on values for vintage, and the financial aspect of collecting rather than the actual collecting.

You raised a valid point but I'm sure most of us here collect because we have a genuine love for the hobby, it's nice to know that something has a value or we'd all be out there collecting shells but there really should be rhyme and reason behind a collection, not simply the acquisition of investments.
 

Awl Skulkerkey

Padawan
Joined
Jan 1, 2017
Messages
174
Location
Leeds
SW £1? I would think most peoples initial reaction would be to rush down the pound shop and go crazy. On second thoughts, my collection is so much more cherished for the fun/time/energy I've gone through jetting up and down the country visiting sellers and having a good old chat about the history of the items and also having a good old haggle. Obviously this collecting game costs more but the journey is so worth it if you have ever found a SW gem at the carboot on a freezing autumn morning at 7am or routing through a dusty toy box in the charity shop and find a sparkling Boba Fett! For me I love the SW collectors journey which I started in good old '77 and forever may it continue! :wink:
 

peekaygee73

Sith Lord
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
1,027
Wreck-It Ralph said:
peekaygee73 said:
I'm not sure I understand the logic behind the question - surely there aren't any collectors out there who purchase vintage Star Wars purely because it's not cheap? Or are we just talking about the 'big boys' out of whose way we need to move?! :wink: :lol:

I am not sure whether there is any logic behind the question either I am just interested in whether price determines desirability. Most collectors have a grail item and most of these grail items are rare and expensive so why do we want these specific grail items is it because they are unattainable due to thier price and rarity?
OK, I see what you mean. It seems more to me that desirability drives price, although over the past 18 months it seems that the root cause of price increases and desirability is a lack of knowledge. It does seem there are a few (mostly new) collectors buying 'grail' items because they're there, rather than because it's a grail item to them. I suppose it's possible a percentage of those are doing that purely to show off they've bought an expensive grail item.
 

Wreck-It Ralph

Jedi Master
Joined
Jan 16, 2017
Messages
893
edd_jedi said:
I don't think Rich was aiming his comment at you asking the question, more peoples answers. I think you'll find we are all some split of collector and investor, although recently I've certainly seen a lot more people tipping towards the investor side. But vintage has never really been cheap - when I collected in the 90s yes you could buy a carded figure for £30 that would now cost £300, but £30 was a lot of money back then! I was at school so it would take me weeks to save up to buy each carded figure. I think my purchases back then probably cost me more in real terms when compared to how much I was earning (paper round and pocket money!)

I am sure your right maybe my interpretation of the post is wrong. I would like to think of myself as a collector not an investor, but naturally I don't want to loose money on what I collect. I am not concerned whether it goes up as I buy it because I love it and it makes me happy.
 

poncho

Grand Master
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,403
Location
North Wales
Awl Skulkerkey said:
SW £1? I would think most peoples initial reaction would be to rush down the pound shop and go crazy. On second thoughts, my collection is so much more cherished for the fun/time/energy I've gone through jetting up and down the country visiting sellers and having a good old chat about the history of the items and also having a good old haggle. Obviously this collecting game costs more but the journey is so worth it if you have ever found a SW gem at the carboot on a freezing autumn morning at 7am or routing through a dusty toy box in the charity shop and find a sparkling Boba Fett! For me I love the SW collectors journey which I started in good old '77 and forever may it continue! :wink:
£1 shop you say? look what i bought a few months ago for **** and giggles from a pound shop.
 

Attachments

  • 1494324047597297117372.jpg
    1494324047597297117372.jpg
    143.8 KB · Views: 292
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Top Bottom