Need confirming this blaster is Original

StarWarsFan

Grand Master
Joined
Apr 2, 2015
Messages
6,244
Hi am selling a Luke Poncho, i'm 99.9% sure the blaster is original but would like a second opinion thanks.
 

Attachments

  • s-l1600-1.jpg
    s-l1600-1.jpg
    43.5 KB · Views: 1,826
  • s-l1600-2.jpg
    s-l1600-2.jpg
    42.4 KB · Views: 1,824
  • s-l1600-3.jpg
    s-l1600-3.jpg
    56.6 KB · Views: 1,821
  • s-l1600-4.jpg
    s-l1600-4.jpg
    50.5 KB · Views: 1,830
  • s-l1600-5.jpg
    s-l1600-5.jpg
    47.4 KB · Views: 1,824
  • s-l1600.jpg
    s-l1600.jpg
    63.3 KB · Views: 1,823

TheJabbaWookie

Sith Lord
Joined
Jun 28, 2017
Messages
2,734
Location
Somewhere Down The Rabbit Hole
Looks good to me. Importantly it has the circle on the magazine and the raised dot on the barrel so can't be Repro v1 or v2, and there is no sign of any excess flashing so would say it can't be Repro v3 either (as cross referenced with TIG).
 

Attachments

  • 105D5170-4436-4AAD-91F0-58F67B551E2E.jpeg
    105D5170-4436-4AAD-91F0-58F67B551E2E.jpeg
    61.6 KB · Views: 1,817
  • 3C3026EC-3922-47F2-BB69-5E3C55D86F38.jpeg
    3C3026EC-3922-47F2-BB69-5E3C55D86F38.jpeg
    61.3 KB · Views: 1,813

Droopy

Padawan
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
238
Yeah that looks legit to me too. I spent a long time trying to find two of these and I've had a number of repros in hand.

As mentioned above, excess flashing is a dead giveaway on repros with the correct mould and this one looks crisp. Also ive noticed that the nub at the back of the barrel is misshapen on repros but this one looks good too.
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.
Top Bottom