Darth Vader Raised Bar COO Value? Meccano?

Dark Sith Lord

Grand Master
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
11,056
Location
Derbyshire
Hi guys. :)

So I won this off Ebay the other day for £9.62!

Just wondering if you could give me an idea of its value?

Is the Raised Bar COO a little scarcer? I read somewhere I think it was on here that Raised Bar is a Meccano variant?
Is this true?

Here are some pictures-

_57_zpseaa9j5va.jpg


_57%202_zpsteejptqt.jpg


As always your advice expertise and insight are always appreciated :)

Liam
 

Dark Sith Lord

Grand Master
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
11,056
Location
Derbyshire
Thanks for the PM Mike so after consulting Lars fantastic guide it appears to be a Meccano

aussiejames said:
There is no tri/mecc Vader.

Hi James. Thanks for chiming in. You have lost me? Who mentioned a tri?

Do you think this a meccao variant?
 

aussiejames

Sith Lord
Joined
Jun 10, 2009
Messages
3,837
Location
Western Australia
To me the only Meccano variants are the few 'unique' figures that seemed to 'only' appear on the French trilogos. ie 'true trilogo Fett' http://swspaceclub.com/wbobafett/my-collection/meccano/

Wolff's picture shows the 'recognised' Meccano figures ( the Chewbacca should be the Macao Biker Scout ) I refer to these as the tri/Mecc. He also mentions " The lightgreen Wally isnt a french exclusive no matter what Coo it has. Same goes for the Vader raised bar. This is obviously an "invention" of those making money with it. To my knowledge both raised bar Vaders can be found all around europe."

Anybody that thinks a figure is unique to any Meccano cardbacks IMO is wrong.


The 'Clipper' Vader can be found with three different mould families. One is the made in Macau baggie which contains a raised bar no CoO. Notice the groove at the fingertips of the extended saber tube.
10377024_439892972835419_3670489449765555868_n.jpg


same as yours
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Top Bottom