Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Other Forums
Star Wars Films
Please delete thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Twin30mm" data-source="post: 483980" data-attributes="member: 5949"><p>We'll have to see if it changes anything. </p><p>Personally, I think Kennedy and her cronies are on borrowed time. Money talks and the Solo film has been handled dreadfully. A real shame as I liked the movie. I suspect Johnsons proposed new trilogy will be quietly shelved as well.</p><p>Unfortunately, this maybe just the sideshow. Unless JJ plays a blinder, Episode IX is where the excrement really hits the air conditioning. </p><p> </p><p>TLJ is the first SW film I have no intention of buying on home release.</p><p>I hate the fact that I hate this movie, but purely as a film it's just......awful. </p><p>Nonsensical script, bland characters, Ridleys stilted delivery, TFAs set-up completeley negated, Rose ****ing Tico....blah, blah, blah.</p><p></p><p>I understand that people like/love TLJ and I really have no problem with that, but it genuinely baffles me that any SW fan (especially from the OT generation) can put this film anywhere near their top 5 SW films. </p><p>How the script got greenlit is beyond me. Subversion just for subversions sake. </p><p>Wasn't that the whole point of the standalone films? A chance to experiment with the saga. Why mess with long established, beloved characters in the main saga films. They were just asking for trouble. </p><p></p><p>The chance has now been wasted to unite the Original 3, give them a respectful send-off and pass the baton to the new generation.</p><p>Sad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Twin30mm, post: 483980, member: 5949"] We'll have to see if it changes anything. Personally, I think Kennedy and her cronies are on borrowed time. Money talks and the Solo film has been handled dreadfully. A real shame as I liked the movie. I suspect Johnsons proposed new trilogy will be quietly shelved as well. Unfortunately, this maybe just the sideshow. Unless JJ plays a blinder, Episode IX is where the excrement really hits the air conditioning. TLJ is the first SW film I have no intention of buying on home release. I hate the fact that I hate this movie, but purely as a film it's just......awful. Nonsensical script, bland characters, Ridleys stilted delivery, TFAs set-up completeley negated, Rose ****ing Tico....blah, blah, blah. I understand that people like/love TLJ and I really have no problem with that, but it genuinely baffles me that any SW fan (especially from the OT generation) can put this film anywhere near their top 5 SW films. How the script got greenlit is beyond me. Subversion just for subversions sake. Wasn't that the whole point of the standalone films? A chance to experiment with the saga. Why mess with long established, beloved characters in the main saga films. They were just asking for trouble. The chance has now been wasted to unite the Original 3, give them a respectful send-off and pass the baton to the new generation. Sad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Other Forums
Star Wars Films
Please delete thread
Top
Bottom