Terminator Genisys – The best mind F*** yet? (spoilers)

Simply Sci-fi

Jedi Knight
Joined
Jan 30, 2014
Messages
428
Terminator Genisys – The best mind F*** yet? Only if you think about the movie. Unfortunately, I watched the film with my brain switched on.

First of all I thought that the first part of the film set in the future and in 1985 was a joy to watch. I only wish they could have spent much longer in both time periods. Playing around with more of the events of T1 in the style of Back to the Future 2 would have been fantastic. That had could have been the focus of the film and Sarah and Kyle could have simply been transported to 2015 for the finale. Some of the original cast could have appeared in the 2015 section, especially because the carnage of T1 and T2 was prevented by the events of Genisys.

I doubt if the logic of the film would have survived any script conference that sought to challenge the events. I can forgive the fact that Sarah Connor and the old T101 were aware of where, when and why Kyle Reece was going to emerge in 1984 and that a T1000 had the same information. And that the pair knew that the T1000 would be there and had time to prepare a trap for it. Who can say what the events were that led to this scenario? Considering the amount of techno babble and exposition in the film already, I'm pleased that the writers did not attempt to explain it.

Anyone actually challenging the plot during scripting may have pointed out that Sarah Connor and the old T101 were aware that the 1985 T1000 was a policeman, driving a fast patrol car but they risked being caught by using a truck to escape in (okay, okay I know the drama has to be ramped up). Worse still the John Connor Terminator and the old T101 could not have infiltrated the company that became Skynet without any kind of ID. If the old T100 had been posing as a worker in the complex why hadn't he done anything to destroy the place, or hidden weapons and bombs inside, etc? The John Connor Terminator could easily have morphed himself into one of the current employees to become one of the staff but he was walking around with his old face on. If he had a fake ID, it could have been rumbled at any time. Later the JC Terminator jumps into a helicopter to chase the one flown by Kyle and risks killing his own parents before they have conceived him. He knew they were going to the company to blow it up and could have waited for them there. Kyle Reece could not have appeared in 2015 because the younger version of himself is living in a normal suburban home and would probably become a bank manager or something. He would not grow up to be a hardened warrior who knew John Connor and be sent back in time. Sarah may have emerged alone in 2015 and Arnie would have had to provide the exposition as to why.

In the scenario set up in the film, the mission to jump forward to 2015 was dangerous and Kyle could have easily been killed. There was no rush for Sarah and Kyle to jump forward in time and they could have spent months getting to know one another and had time to conceive John Connor. A "touching " romantic interlude might have been apt where Sarah and Kyle can be seen to fall in love and "get it together." The dead pan Arnie could have interrupted at intervals saying "Have you mated yet?" Oh the irony in that the son they took so much care to conceive would be the one to pose the biggest threat to humanity!

Hold on. The biggest, mind f****ing mis-step of all was that out of all of the people the new advanced Terminator could have merged with and jump back in time, he chose John Connor. JC was the one person more than anyone else who risked his own existence by killing Sarah and Kyle and it cancelled out the danger that the pair were in as a result. Skynet's new plan seemed to be, to send a man/terminator back in time and hand over all of the information required to make the rise of the machines possible. So why chose John Connor?

This is a whole level of complexity that the movie just did not need. Going back to dumb logic, if the Terminator or whatever it was that infected JC was present as Reece was preparing to go back in time, why did it not just kill him there and then? Too simple? Kill John Connor's father. Machine logic. Oh, instead the advanced Terminator thinks: I'll merge with the very man that all of the Terminators in time are attempting to eradicate by killing his mother. If they succeed, its curtains for me. I won't be able to infiltrate Cyberdine. I'll keep in mind not kill JC's mother and father who are attempting to stop me while I attempt to stop them because I'll eradicate myself. The risk of the entire space-time continuum folding in on itself to a point where none of the Terminator events will ever happen was a huge risk at this stage.

In future Terminator films, if the JC Terminator makes a return, it would be an incentive for Kyle and Sarah not to get it together because they cannot be pursued by a son that they have not conceived. By the way I can't remove from my mind the terrible performance of Jason Clarke as Kyle Reece. He's a completely different character to the original that didn't appeal to me at all.

As I'm typing this I can imagine the reaction I would get from an average 14-year old in bringing these points up. "Well, what about the cool chases, the robots fighting and stuff? What's a plot hole?" A large part of me is telling me to forget about all of the dumb elements of the film and just focus on the fun parts. There were a lot fun parts. The first fifteen minutes are worth the price of admission alone. I thought the fifty feet tall, IMAX 3D Emilia Clarke looked terrific with her slightly pumped up Sarah Connor physique. Sorry but isn't that one of James Cameron's great innovations? A foxy lady in the middle of the action, kicking butt with the boys?

Terminator is important to me and I'm attempting to convince myself that I did not waste my time and money in seeing Genisys. The terminator has a reputation for being smart sci-fi but to me this reboot is dumb sci-fi.
 
Looks to me like they just did this one to wipe out the existence of the previous movies to keep the story going, i.e to milk the cow.
Fun to se arnold though, but John Connor as a Terminator... As said, the plot of the originals are gone now, they can do anything.
 
Hey

I'm new here in case your wondering who this anonymous person is.
Now main thing, there is no point discussing the logic of the Terminator movies. I love them all but the logic will always stink. If you think back to the whole series.
1 I don't understand where Terminator Salvation fits in all this.
2 John Conner doesn't have to be the target why doesn't sky net just go and kill Kyle Reese instead because if he doesn't exist neither will John Conner (I assume).
3 My family freaked out when they found out Arnold was playing two different Terminators and that his skin ages in the movies.
4 Skynet seems to be more like an alien life form rather than a military war machine.
5 There are apparently going to be another 2 movies so I don't know how you feel about that.
6 How come Arnold T800 (101) is more durable than the others.
7 Everybody will always watch Terminator for explosions.

You might as well just watch the movies mindlessly and enjoy it.
 
You really put some thought into this. Here's another theory though, every time you move through time you create an alternate reality running along with the original instead of destroying it.
What pissed me off was know one knew who sent Arnie back, he just was some how.
 
Yeah, there's the alternate timelines thing. I don't know if it is relevant to Terminator Genisys. I'm not sure my brain could take the strain of mulling it over. Maybe someone will put together a defence of the movie using alternative time lines.

I agree that it was annoying that it wasn't explained how the old Terminator and a T1000 were sent to the 1970's to when Sarah was a child. Also how the T1000 from T2 ended up in 1985 instead of 1995. As I said, it would have been an additional layer of exposition for the audience to wrap their minds around. I suppose it may have been an attempt by the writers to clear up all of the carnage in T1 and T2 because in the reboot, the killing sprees don't happen. The T101 and T1000 are stopped before they hurt anybody – even the punks!

MiniGeek 93: I agree totally with what you have to say. The logic of the Terminator series and time travel films in general will always stink, because the writers need to balance the needs of the script against the science aspects of time travel. I thought though that T1 and T2 did a very good job of avoiding any glaring errors and inconsistencies.

You're right that Kyle Reece should be as much of a target as Sarah Connor, which was why it seemed dumb for the new terminator not to take him out in the Time Displacement Chamber before he was sent to 1985. Arnie will always be more durable than the other Terminators and will always win – he's the face of the franchise, whether he'll pay the character in person or merely be generated in CGI. Terminator Salvation and T3 are not part of the new franchise, with TG being a sequel to T2. I'm not sure if I'll see the two further films, but you're right that people will always watch the movies for the explosions, etc.

Tundra9: Yep, the producers can do anything they like now. Even more time travel could be possible as Guardian knows how to make a time displacement device. We can expect even greater action – thrills and spills with Arnie delving further into his catch-phrase memory bank. It could be fun.
 
Is it not possible that even if Kyle Reece was taken out Sarah Connor could still have had a child who became John Conn ...oh my brain just melted :lol:
 
I was speaking to Shawn K about this film recently as he went to see it and I wanted to know if it was worth watching. He said he enjoyed it better than the last couple of shitty movies but at the end of the day it was just a mindless action movie and it's best not to get worked up about the timeline, the problems with the story/back story and whatever else which is probably good advice.

I like to discuss movies as much as anyone but honestly I think you could pick holes in almost all of them, including some of the best films ever made..the problem with the Terminator storyline is that it involves time travel and that's something that is easily ****ed up when you make a sequel. Even T2 has a lot of problems with it right from the start and it's one of the best movies/sequels of all time. If you over think things and engage your common sense while you watch it though you'll soon notice it's really problematic and chock full of things that really don't make sense.

Check this out:

[youtube]BfQ1UnAZze8[/youtube]

And that's just a fun jab at the movie by people that probably love it, but yeah..the Terminator timeline will always be bad, the logic will always be bad and if they keep making movies those things will always get worse but sometimes you have to turn off your brain before you go see a movie.

My biggest gripe with reboots, sequels, prequels and remakes is that they usually detract from what the originals meant to the fans who saw them at the time or soon after they were released. A lot of what makes an original film a hit in the first place is that it's not been done to death before and it's something new..sadly when you keep reworking those ideas you lose a lot of what made them special in the first place.
 
:lol: that vid was quality, so much so that I went on to watch the Jurassic Park 3 one ...there's so much wrong with that film!.

The Terminator review makes some excellent points, for example - 1. John Connor is an asshole, and 2. how do all those kids manage to point the T1000 in John Connor's direction the whole time when he's looking for him? Everyone knows where John Connor is at all times. Amazing :?
 
Those 'everything wrong videos' are rubbish, could only watch 4 minutes of this one. It's a film about time travel, I don't need to watch a 16 minute video to point out the flaws. :roll:
 
theforceuk said:
Those 'everything wrong videos' are rubbish, could only watch 4 minutes of this one. It's a film about time travel, I don't need to watch a 16 minute video to point out the flaws. :roll:

Those sin review videos aren't meant to be serious you know, it's just for fun :)

Those guys quite often rip the piss out of their own favourite movies actually and even when they do one on a movie that I really love, I can't help but laugh at them because in most cases the stupid things they are pointing out are actually pretty stupid :D I find them quite amusing!

I do agree with you though that pointing out the flaws in the timeline of a series of movies that heavily rely on time travel is a waste of time, which is exactly why I posted the video in the first place. It proves that ALL of the Terminator movies have issues..so my opinion on the reboots/remakes/sequels and prequels is either ignore them and stick to the ones you love or go along realising that it's all a bunch of bollocks churned out to make even more money with no ****s given about the plot/timeline.

PS: On the subject of movie piss takes..have you ever seen the riff trax guys take the piss out of movies? Don't think they did T1 or T2 but they did T3:

[youtube]-xCzTuqacKQ[/youtube]

The Lord of the Rings ones are the best though..

[youtube]TzZXXH4ABu0[/youtube]

TBH I'd rather have a funny discussion about a movie and have a laugh at the obvious problems than a serious discussion about how it all doesn't make sense. At the end of the day they are just movies and there isn't a single movie out there that is 100% accurate throughout.

(Sorry Craig - went OT slightly :D )
 
Joe said:
theforceuk said:
Those 'everything wrong videos' are rubbish, could only watch 4 minutes of this one. It's a film about time travel, I don't need to watch a 16 minute video to point out the flaws. :roll:

Those sin review videos aren't meant to be serious you know, it's just for fun :)

Those guys quite often rip the piss out of their own favourite movies actually and even when they do one on a movie that I really love, I can't help but laugh at them because in most cases the stupid things they are pointing out are actually pretty stupid :D I find them quite amusing!



TBH I'd rather have a funny discussion about a movie and have a laugh at the obvious problems than a serious discussion about how it all doesn't make sense. At the end of the day they are just movies and there isn't a single movie out there that is 100% accurate throughout.


^^^ This

It's just a laugh. Same with a lot of movies. They might even be your favourites but a lot of them are hugely flawed. I actually love Jurassic Park 3 and some of that is down to just how bad it is. I rip the piss out of the SW prequels mercilessly but deep down I actually quite like them. There are similar reviews out there pointing out all the stupid bits. It's just for laughs, and why not :)
 
Thanks for the informed comments everyone. A 2 ½ hour train journey has provided me enough time to tackle the points brought up by YouTube film.

I don't want to get too "anal" about the Terminator series but this is sci-fi from my generation. The ins and outs of T1 and T2 had been discussed over countless conversations between fans before the YouTube film maker was out of nappies. Who is he to make a snickering destruction of T2? He should have had some of those conversations first. I spent almost an entire convention discussing the Terminator and Back to the Future films with one of my German friends, until our brains nearly did melt.

James Cameron is a genre film maker, and is what I'd call an "audience pleaser." If you want Twelve Monkeys or Blade Runner, you've walked into the wrong cinema. A James Cameron script is as efficiently relentless as a Terminator. Of course there will be moments that are based on clichés – audiences take satisfaction in seeing elements that they are familiar with, such as finding car keys under the sun visor. Cameron streamlines the events of his scripts, relying on incredible co-incidences, such as the T1000 just happening to run into some kid girls who have just seen John Connor. Liberties were taken with John Connor's age, because a ten-year-old is unlikely to be a street savvy and as good an actor as a teenager. I'll bet that nobody questioned JC's age when the film first came out. Vehicles, weapons, etc will always defy the laws of physics and perform well above their design specs. You can't fly a helicopter with one hand and shoot out of the window (something the YouTube film missed) – but hey, this is the movies!

John Connor is playing the ancient video game Missile Command because the object is to stop missiles from falling. The allegory is much more important than any concerns over whether the game would be installed in a modern day mall. There are plenty of references for the audience to spot. Among many things; the Terminator's rifle hidden in a box of roses (Guns n Roses on the soundtrack). The obligatory cast member from a previous Cameron film in a different role (Aliens' Vasquez as JC's mother). Similarly casting Robert Winley as the bar patron accosted by Arnie, who was also the bar patron picked on by Bill Paxton in Near Dark (which was unofficially "produced" by Cameron). In T1 and T2 the first confrontation between the two "male" protagonists results in Arnie being thrown through a window on to his back and left to rise up and re-join the action. Sarah Connor presses the button to destroy Arnie in both films but the emotions are reversed. In T1 it was an act of hatred and visceral relief. In T2 it was a moment of sadness and mutual respect. When the shrink Dr Silberman describes to his fellows that Sarah Connor believed that a man from the future fathered her son, someone says "That's original." Cameron is making fun of writer Harlen Ellison who successfully sued over T1 allegedly using many of his ideas. Perhaps the most obvious reference for the audience to spot is that humanity's saviour shares the same initials as the film's creator.

T-1000 being armed with puny weapons is a statement about his/its "moral inadequacy". In James Cameron's universe, only good guys have moral authority to use powerful weapons. Only hot women can use firearms full stop, which says as much about Cameron's personal fetishes as about his business sense. Of course the police are totally incompetent and don't shoot at tyres and don't turn up when the action is going on. That would get in the way of the forward momentum of the script. It's also a statement about how human-kind is incompetent as a whole and ripe for subjugation by the machines. The T1000 is not provided with any catch phrases beyond "That's a nice bike" because it is not allowed to be shown to be cool, and also cannot transform itself into anyone who is cool. The audience does not see through the T1000's eyes because it is Arnie they should be identifying with. In T2, Arnie is now the good guy so the thrill of imagining yourself as a Terminator (another Cameron fetish?) is not a guilty pleasure.

The choice of vehicles for a pursuit scene in T1 and T2 is down to whether the chaser or escapee has the advantage in that particular section of the film. It's nearly always the good guys that end up in much slower vehicles in order to ramp up the drama. The T1000 chose a Mack truck because it is yet another sly reference; this time to where the Terminator crushes an identical toy version in T1. There is a glaring "dumb moment" when the T1000 captures Sarah Connor as tells her to call out to JC, when it could have mimicked her voice. Drama versus logic. Drama wins in this instance (or is it another manifestation of the T1000 beginning to break down after being frozen?). It does appear that the T1000 delays in killing JC when it has taken Sarah Connor's image but James Cameron probably wanted to make the most of using Lynda Hamilton's identical twin sister in the scene (the reason why Hamilton was cast in T1?). The situation of JC having to choose between an imposter and a real person is another dramatic cliché for the audience to revel in.

The maker of the YouTube film should take a crash course in the Terminator time line. In T1 Reece is sent after a Terminator sent to 1984, where Skynet knew Sarah Connor was living at the time, probably via census records. After Reece was sent through, the resistance discovered that Skynet had sent a T1000 to 1995, probably finding out where John Connor was living via the census again. Skynet does not have a great deal of information about the past, as Kyle Reece explained in T1.The resistance sent through a re-programmed Terminator to chase the T1000. There were not two time machines. Too simple? The T1000 being sent through the time machine without being covered by human skin is a good point too but the only person who spoke of the restrictions was Kyle Reece, who isn't the most qualified person in the world and nor are the human rebels. After sending the first Terminator through naked, Skynet may have found a way to re-calibrate the machine in order to send the human flesh-mimicking T1000 through. If Skynet had enough time to plan and prepare, it could have developed a bag of living tissue for the T1000 to be covered in for the jump. Its actual arrival is not shown in T2.

Miles Dyson does not get a head start in T2 because it is the same events happening time and time again. The heroes in Terminator 2 don't all fade away and the timeline re-set itself at the end of the film, because Judgement Day is still going to happen (as we see in T3). They believe that they have done everything to guarantee that the future has been changed but all they are doing is carrying out the same actions which perpetuate the time loop for all eternity. When John Connor survives the nuclear destruction and sends Kyle Reece back, it will lead to the events of T2 all over again. It could be argued that JC could have programmed the good Terminator to tell his younger self to do certain things, such as not to rescue his mother from the mental institution. How does JC know that will alter the future in a beneficial way? The object in sending the good Terminator back is to maintain the status quo and prevent the past from being altered. JC is probably being pragmatic. Yes, the destruction has been terrible but at least humankind has triumphed and he does not want to do anything which will endanger that.

Terminator 3 has its problems but at least its ending leads directly to the beginning of T1 - an almost perfect "time circle." The original Planet of the Apes films present a similar "time circle." Terminator Genisys had a tough brief: To break the time circle. To somehow bring the old Arnie, a young Kyle and Sarah into 2015. Also it appears that the carnage of all the previous movies had to be prevented too. The writers could have achieved this in many ways without going down the "dumb" route and relying on the audience turning their brains off. If it was a matter of drama versus logic, how did making John Connor a Terminator ramp up the excitement if he could not kill his parents? If nothing else T1 and T2 were suspenseful. TG was a haunted house without any scares.
 
If you had time to watch and digest the YouTube film, you have time to read and digest my post.

I thought people might appreciate some "interesting" points about the Terminator series.
 
Simply Sci-fi said:
Thanks for the informed comments everyone. A 2 ½ hour train journey has provided me enough time to tackle the points brought up by YouTube film.

I don't want to get too "anal" about the Terminator series but this is sci-fi from my generation. The ins and outs of T1 and T2 had been discussed over countless conversations between fans before the YouTube film maker was out of nappies. Who is he to make a snickering destruction of T2? He should have had some of those conversations first. I spent almost an entire convention discussing the Terminator and Back to the Future films with one of my German friends, until our brains nearly did melt.

James Cameron is a genre film maker, and is what I'd call an "audience pleaser." If you want Twelve Monkeys or Blade Runner, you've walked into the wrong cinema. A James Cameron script is as efficiently relentless as a Terminator. Of course there will be moments that are based on clichés – audiences take satisfaction in seeing elements that they are familiar with, such as finding car keys under the sun visor. Cameron streamlines the events of his scripts, relying on incredible co-incidences, such as the T1000 just happening to run into some kid girls who have just seen John Connor. Liberties were taken with John Connor's age, because a ten-year-old is unlikely to be a street savvy and as good an actor as a teenager. I'll bet that nobody questioned JC's age when the film first came out. Vehicles, weapons, etc will always defy the laws of physics and perform well above their design specs. You can't fly a helicopter with one hand and shoot out of the window (something the YouTube film missed) – but hey, this is the movies!

John Connor is playing the ancient video game Missile Command because the object is to stop missiles from falling. The allegory is much more important than any concerns over whether the game would be installed in a modern day mall. There are plenty of references for the audience to spot. Among many things; the Terminator's rifle hidden in a box of roses (Guns n Roses on the soundtrack). The obligatory cast member from a previous Cameron film in a different role (Aliens' Vasquez as JC's mother). Similarly casting Robert Winley as the bar patron accosted by Arnie, who was also the bar patron picked on by Bill Paxton in Near Dark (which was unofficially "produced" by Cameron). In T1 and T2 the first confrontation between the two "male" protagonists results in Arnie being thrown through a window on to his back and left to rise up and re-join the action. Sarah Connor presses the button to destroy Arnie in both films but the emotions are reversed. In T1 it was an act of hatred and visceral relief. In T2 it was a moment of sadness and mutual respect. When the shrink Dr Silberman describes to his fellows that Sarah Connor believed that a man from the future fathered her son, someone says "That's original." Cameron is making fun of writer Harlen Ellison who successfully sued over T1 allegedly using many of his ideas. Perhaps the most obvious reference for the audience to spot is that humanity's saviour shares the same initials as the film's creator.

T-1000 being armed with puny weapons is a statement about his/its "moral inadequacy". In James Cameron's universe, only good guys have moral authority to use powerful weapons. Only hot women can use firearms full stop, which says as much about Cameron's personal fetishes as about his business sense. Of course the police are totally incompetent and don't shoot at tyres and don't turn up when the action is going on. That would get in the way of the forward momentum of the script. It's also a statement about how human-kind is incompetent as a whole and ripe for subjugation by the machines. The T1000 is not provided with any catch phrases beyond "That's a nice bike" because it is not allowed to be shown to be cool, and also cannot transform itself into anyone who is cool. The audience does not see through the T1000's eyes because it is Arnie they should be identifying with. In T2, Arnie is now the good guy so the thrill of imagining yourself as a Terminator (another Cameron fetish?) is not a guilty pleasure.

The choice of vehicles for a pursuit scene in T1 and T2 is down to whether the chaser or escapee has the advantage in that particular section of the film. It's nearly always the good guys that end up in much slower vehicles in order to ramp up the drama. The T1000 chose a Mack truck because it is yet another sly reference; this time to where the Terminator crushes an identical toy version in T1. There is a glaring "dumb moment" when the T1000 captures Sarah Connor as tells her to call out to JC, when it could have mimicked her voice. Drama versus logic. Drama wins in this instance (or is it another manifestation of the T1000 beginning to break down after being frozen?). It does appear that the T1000 delays in killing JC when it has taken Sarah Connor's image but James Cameron probably wanted to make the most of using Lynda Hamilton's identical twin sister in the scene (the reason why Hamilton was cast in T1?). The situation of JC having to choose between an imposter and a real person is another dramatic cliché for the audience to revel in.

The maker of the YouTube film should take a crash course in the Terminator time line. In T1 Reece is sent after a Terminator sent to 1984, where Skynet knew Sarah Connor was living at the time, probably via census records. After Reece was sent through, the resistance discovered that Skynet had sent a T1000 to 1995, probably finding out where John Connor was living via the census again. Skynet does not have a great deal of information about the past, as Kyle Reece explained in T1.The resistance sent through a re-programmed Terminator to chase the T1000. There were not two time machines. Too simple? The T1000 being sent through the time machine without being covered by human skin is a good point too but the only person who spoke of the restrictions was Kyle Reece, who isn't the most qualified person in the world and nor are the human rebels. After sending the first Terminator through naked, Skynet may have found a way to re-calibrate the machine in order to send the human flesh-mimicking T1000 through. If Skynet had enough time to plan and prepare, it could have developed a bag of living tissue for the T1000 to be covered in for the jump. Its actual arrival is not shown in T2.

Miles Dyson does not get a head start in T2 because it is the same events happening time and time again. The heroes in Terminator 2 don't all fade away and the timeline re-set itself at the end of the film, because Judgement Day is still going to happen (as we see in T3). They believe that they have done everything to guarantee that the future has been changed but all they are doing is carrying out the same actions which perpetuate the time loop for all eternity. When John Connor survives the nuclear destruction and sends Kyle Reece back, it will lead to the events of T2 all over again. It could be argued that JC could have programmed the good Terminator to tell his younger self to do certain things, such as not to rescue his mother from the mental institution. How does JC know that will alter the future in a beneficial way? The object in sending the good Terminator back is to maintain the status quo and prevent the past from being altered. JC is probably being pragmatic. Yes, the destruction has been terrible but at least humankind has triumphed and he does not want to do anything which will endanger that.

Terminator 3 has its problems but at least its ending leads directly to the beginning of T1 - an almost perfect "time circle." The original Planet of the Apes films present a similar "time circle." Terminator Genisys had a tough brief: To break the time circle. To somehow bring the old Arnie, a young Kyle and Sarah into 2015. Also it appears that the carnage of all the previous movies had to be prevented too. The writers could have achieved this in many ways without going down the "dumb" route and relying on the audience turning their brains off. If it was a matter of drama versus logic, how did making John Connor a Terminator ramp up the excitement if he could not kill his parents? If nothing else T1 and T2 were suspenseful. TG was a haunted house without any scares.


Yeah I agree with this. /\/\/\ :shock: :lol:
 
theforceuk said:
Simply Sci-fi said:
Thanks for the informed comments everyone. A 2 ½ hour train journey has provided me enough time to tackle the points brought up by YouTube film.

I don't want to get too "anal" about the Terminator series but this is sci-fi from my generation. The ins and outs of T1 and T2 had been discussed over countless conversations between fans before the YouTube film maker was out of nappies. Who is he to make a snickering destruction of T2? He should have had some of those conversations first. I spent almost an entire convention discussing the Terminator and Back to the Future films with one of my German friends, until our brains nearly did melt.

James Cameron is a genre film maker, and is what I'd call an "audience pleaser." If you want Twelve Monkeys or Blade Runner, you've walked into the wrong cinema. A James Cameron script is as efficiently relentless as a Terminator. Of course there will be moments that are based on clichés – audiences take satisfaction in seeing elements that they are familiar with, such as finding car keys under the sun visor. Cameron streamlines the events of his scripts, relying on incredible co-incidences, such as the T1000 just happening to run into some kid girls who have just seen John Connor. Liberties were taken with John Connor's age, because a ten-year-old is unlikely to be a street savvy and as good an actor as a teenager. I'll bet that nobody questioned JC's age when the film first came out. Vehicles, weapons, etc will always defy the laws of physics and perform well above their design specs. You can't fly a helicopter with one hand and shoot out of the window (something the YouTube film missed) – but hey, this is the movies!

John Connor is playing the ancient video game Missile Command because the object is to stop missiles from falling. The allegory is much more important than any concerns over whether the game would be installed in a modern day mall. There are plenty of references for the audience to spot. Among many things; the Terminator's rifle hidden in a box of roses (Guns n Roses on the soundtrack). The obligatory cast member from a previous Cameron film in a different role (Aliens' Vasquez as JC's mother). Similarly casting Robert Winley as the bar patron accosted by Arnie, who was also the bar patron picked on by Bill Paxton in Near Dark (which was unofficially "produced" by Cameron). In T1 and T2 the first confrontation between the two "male" protagonists results in Arnie being thrown through a window on to his back and left to rise up and re-join the action. Sarah Connor presses the button to destroy Arnie in both films but the emotions are reversed. In T1 it was an act of hatred and visceral relief. In T2 it was a moment of sadness and mutual respect. When the shrink Dr Silberman describes to his fellows that Sarah Connor believed that a man from the future fathered her son, someone says "That's original." Cameron is making fun of writer Harlen Ellison who successfully sued over T1 allegedly using many of his ideas. Perhaps the most obvious reference for the audience to spot is that humanity's saviour shares the same initials as the film's creator.

T-1000 being armed with puny weapons is a statement about his/its "moral inadequacy". In James Cameron's universe, only good guys have moral authority to use powerful weapons. Only hot women can use firearms full stop, which says as much about Cameron's personal fetishes as about his business sense. Of course the police are totally incompetent and don't shoot at tyres and don't turn up when the action is going on. That would get in the way of the forward momentum of the script. It's also a statement about how human-kind is incompetent as a whole and ripe for subjugation by the machines. The T1000 is not provided with any catch phrases beyond "That's a nice bike" because it is not allowed to be shown to be cool, and also cannot transform itself into anyone who is cool. The audience does not see through the T1000's eyes because it is Arnie they should be identifying with. In T2, Arnie is now the good guy so the thrill of imagining yourself as a Terminator (another Cameron fetish?) is not a guilty pleasure.

The choice of vehicles for a pursuit scene in T1 and T2 is down to whether the chaser or escapee has the advantage in that particular section of the film. It's nearly always the good guys that end up in much slower vehicles in order to ramp up the drama. The T1000 chose a Mack truck because it is yet another sly reference; this time to where the Terminator crushes an identical toy version in T1. There is a glaring "dumb moment" when the T1000 captures Sarah Connor as tells her to call out to JC, when it could have mimicked her voice. Drama versus logic. Drama wins in this instance (or is it another manifestation of the T1000 beginning to break down after being frozen?). It does appear that the T1000 delays in killing JC when it has taken Sarah Connor's image but James Cameron probably wanted to make the most of using Lynda Hamilton's identical twin sister in the scene (the reason why Hamilton was cast in T1?). The situation of JC having to choose between an imposter and a real person is another dramatic cliché for the audience to revel in.

The maker of the YouTube film should take a crash course in the Terminator time line. In T1 Reece is sent after a Terminator sent to 1984, where Skynet knew Sarah Connor was living at the time, probably via census records. After Reece was sent through, the resistance discovered that Skynet had sent a T1000 to 1995, probably finding out where John Connor was living via the census again. Skynet does not have a great deal of information about the past, as Kyle Reece explained in T1.The resistance sent through a re-programmed Terminator to chase the T1000. There were not two time machines. Too simple? The T1000 being sent through the time machine without being covered by human skin is a good point too but the only person who spoke of the restrictions was Kyle Reece, who isn't the most qualified person in the world and nor are the human rebels. After sending the first Terminator through naked, Skynet may have found a way to re-calibrate the machine in order to send the human flesh-mimicking T1000 through. If Skynet had enough time to plan and prepare, it could have developed a bag of living tissue for the T1000 to be covered in for the jump. Its actual arrival is not shown in T2.

Miles Dyson does not get a head start in T2 because it is the same events happening time and time again. The heroes in Terminator 2 don't all fade away and the timeline re-set itself at the end of the film, because Judgement Day is still going to happen (as we see in T3). They believe that they have done everything to guarantee that the future has been changed but all they are doing is carrying out the same actions which perpetuate the time loop for all eternity. When John Connor survives the nuclear destruction and sends Kyle Reece back, it will lead to the events of T2 all over again. It could be argued that JC could have programmed the good Terminator to tell his younger self to do certain things, such as not to rescue his mother from the mental institution. How does JC know that will alter the future in a beneficial way? The object in sending the good Terminator back is to maintain the status quo and prevent the past from being altered. JC is probably being pragmatic. Yes, the destruction has been terrible but at least humankind has triumphed and he does not want to do anything which will endanger that.

Terminator 3 has its problems but at least its ending leads directly to the beginning of T1 - an almost perfect "time circle." The original Planet of the Apes films present a similar "time circle." Terminator Genisys had a tough brief: To break the time circle. To somehow bring the old Arnie, a young Kyle and Sarah into 2015. Also it appears that the carnage of all the previous movies had to be prevented too. The writers could have achieved this in many ways without going down the "dumb" route and relying on the audience turning their brains off. If it was a matter of drama versus logic, how did making John Connor a Terminator ramp up the excitement if he could not kill his parents? If nothing else T1 and T2 were suspenseful. TG was a haunted house without any scares.


Yeah I agree with this. /\/\/\ :shock: :lol:



Me too! :?
 
Old Thread: Hello . There have been no replies in this thread for 365 days.
Content in this thread may no longer be relevant.
Perhaps it would be better to start a new thread instead.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom