Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles and first posts only
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
The damage lighter fluid does on vintage MOC's and packaging
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="finestcomics" data-source="post: 323839" data-attributes="member: 4368"><p>Short of spelling out the context of me referencing these, or asking you to reread my post, I have nothing further to add. It's pretty self-explanatory.</p><p></p><p>If you coming on these boards and belittling/ridiculing what I'm trying do, which is to raise awareness and educate on the matter of reconditioning using lighter fluid and the need for disclosure isn't an attack, I don't know what else to make of it.</p><p></p><p>I'm not sure what else you want in the way of proof, but I've already urged you to do a lighter test. I'm also not sure if you even read the article I linked in the very first post of this thread, but there is a <u><strong>quote there from Stephen Ward of UKG which very clearly suggests not using lighter fluid</strong></u>. Combine this with the suggestions I've heard from paper experts with a combined 45 years of experience on conserving paper, and adhering to museum conservation standards, I don't know what else I need to say.</p><p></p><p>Even if you continue to ignore the suggestions I've already put forward from paper experts, I do happen to believe you do respect Stephen Ward's opinion enough, especially when I told you your UKG Palitoy Fett mailer was pieced together with parts not belonging with one another. An issue I raised with you because I wasn't sure if you didn't know well enough from your limelighting it as a one-of-a-kind rarity, but definitely to help you better understand it was an anomalous, one-time things UKG would never do again, and that AFA would not recognize or grade in the same way.</p><p></p><p>Again, I bring these matters up to give you a clear trail of examples, all fact based (and please don't twist the truth) of someone who has demonstrated a capacity and willingness to learn and change for the better of the hobby, and who also shares an interest in educating and sharing information which helps others put a positive foot forward. All things which are surprising given the current situation and your insistent dogma for attacking my position on the use of lighter fluid, even when there's suggestions of strict avoidance from people you've turned to in the past for direction and advise. </p><p></p><p>Explain it so I'm not resigned to believe it's just how you keep up appearances, and conveniently pick and choose what you want to divulge, so long as it doesn't make you look bad.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="finestcomics, post: 323839, member: 4368"] Short of spelling out the context of me referencing these, or asking you to reread my post, I have nothing further to add. It's pretty self-explanatory. If you coming on these boards and belittling/ridiculing what I'm trying do, which is to raise awareness and educate on the matter of reconditioning using lighter fluid and the need for disclosure isn't an attack, I don't know what else to make of it. I'm not sure what else you want in the way of proof, but I've already urged you to do a lighter test. I'm also not sure if you even read the article I linked in the very first post of this thread, but there is a [u][b]quote there from Stephen Ward of UKG which very clearly suggests not using lighter fluid[/b][/u]. Combine this with the suggestions I've heard from paper experts with a combined 45 years of experience on conserving paper, and adhering to museum conservation standards, I don't know what else I need to say. Even if you continue to ignore the suggestions I've already put forward from paper experts, I do happen to believe you do respect Stephen Ward's opinion enough, especially when I told you your UKG Palitoy Fett mailer was pieced together with parts not belonging with one another. An issue I raised with you because I wasn't sure if you didn't know well enough from your limelighting it as a one-of-a-kind rarity, but definitely to help you better understand it was an anomalous, one-time things UKG would never do again, and that AFA would not recognize or grade in the same way. Again, I bring these matters up to give you a clear trail of examples, all fact based (and please don't twist the truth) of someone who has demonstrated a capacity and willingness to learn and change for the better of the hobby, and who also shares an interest in educating and sharing information which helps others put a positive foot forward. All things which are surprising given the current situation and your insistent dogma for attacking my position on the use of lighter fluid, even when there's suggestions of strict avoidance from people you've turned to in the past for direction and advise. Explain it so I'm not resigned to believe it's just how you keep up appearances, and conveniently pick and choose what you want to divulge, so long as it doesn't make you look bad. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Vintage Star Wars Collecting
Vintage Collecting Chat
The damage lighter fluid does on vintage MOC's and packaging
Top
Bottom