A strong no from me, I see it as great for the collector who wants that done, but imo it still ruins the card, plus i'm guessing it would be very difficult to prove it's authentic unless there's a COA with it.
I think signing it ruins that MOC for other collectors who may want it in future.
You don't own your toys, you only borrow themuntil you sell them or die!
I wouldn't either myself I feel it ruins the moc. I like having a carded figure the way it left the factory untampered with. If I was into autographs I would get a picture signed.
I don't flush the toilet, I scare the shit out of it. ~Chuck Norris~ Age is no barrier. It's a limitation you put on your mind ~Jackie Joyner-Kersee~ Arf arf arf... That's my other dog imitation. ~Sgt. Oddball~
I wouldn’t get aMOC signed, as Yoda said, I like mine as they left the factory. I personally wouldn’t buy a signed card either, I think that it devalues the item, and oh, yes, it looks shit... If you want something signed get it on a photo.
Definitely a no. I don't even really associate the actors with the figures. Especially pointless with non human characters where you can't even see their faces. Could literally be anyone in that Klaatu outfit
My son bought a repro fett card and bubble ( few years ago) but he put a vintage fett in it for the sole purpose of getting JB to sight it...does look pretty cool. The back of the card clearly states reproduction as well.