
need to see it again really
Thats exactly how its meant to be - 30s in new hope late teens/early 20s in Solo. Han is meant to be about 10 years older than Luke (who was somewhere between 18 and 20 in ANH). like all Star Wars movies its not worth thinking about them too much as they dont quite workCardbackkid wrote:Finally got round to seeing it last night and really enjoyed it although I read somewhere it’s set 14 years before a new hope which I don’t really understand has Han is meant to be about 18 and that would make him 32 in a new hope and I always thought Han in was in his early 20’s in ANH?
But there were no ghosts in itJoe wrote:I enjoyed it
Oh boy, move along, move along. You've watched the right movie and... oh dear... it is not a Disney one. Do you get it? Hijacked? My God, you must be desperate by now. Still believe in modern SW? Get a life...weasel wrote:Mr. Tie wrote:Well, there is a lot I think about "Solo: A Shitty Story". But it seems that I've entered the Desperado desperate gang, against better hope believe that this Disney crap can get any better. And there's the good news: It will get worser by time and soon no one will care about this shit because Disney has ruined the magic from the beginning. Bottoms up guys... enjoy the crap![]()
![]()
Let's not have another thread hijacked by your dislike of the films under Disney. We may have broadly similar opinions of the last film but that doesn't mean I'm gonna let you hijack the thread. You don't like what Disney have done to SW, we get that. Let's leave it at that and move along.
Reading between the lines you're okay with this thenCazza wrote:Hoooofoooookin-raaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyy!!!! Don't let the door hit you on the way out![]()
theforceuk wrote: Have you watched it yet Weasel?