r2isamale said:
First of all. I was a SW freak 35 years ago and going back that alley again.
As for the Leia we just have to agree to disagree. But when the seller got her back he used the old photos for the ebay ad where the gun was inside the bubble. I am an attorney so I think that I know what misrepresentation is. But enough of that.
As for the U grades. I will not have any figures U graded but I will happily buy those that already are.
Cheerio,
Christian
No one said you haven't been a long time fan of the movies, or even the toys. However, you do admit you have only recently jumped on the collecting train. Therefore, it would be advisable for anyone in your position to heed the advice of people who have been in this hobby for decades.
There is a disconnect here between what exactly you are claiming is misrepresentation. Attorney or not, you seem to be confused in this case.
In the RS thread, you claim the seller misrepresented the item because when it arrived, the figure was coming through the bubble and the weapon was loose in the AFA case. The listing mentioned the bubble crack, and there were pictures of it. The amount of protection inside the shipping box was 100% irrelevant, because NONE of it was able to secure that bubble at all. Take that as your first lesson on why buying AFA carded figures is inherently risky. The figure moves freely within the confines of the bubble, so one movement the wrong way during shipment - and you have a figure coming out the bubble and a weapon having a play day outside the bubble. This was the reason for your initial post, was it not? And the reason you demanded a refund? WHERE did the seller misrepresent the condition of the item? Honestly, only a halfwit would think buying something with a hole in the top, and then upon receipt finding the weapon no longer in the bubble would be the fault of the seller.
Now, you seem to be sidestepping that part of the story to concentrate on what the seller has done since receiving it back. If they managed to get that blaster back in the bubble, then the condition is no different than it was when they sold it to you. The size of the hole would only require the patience needed to wait until you get it back inside. No need for new pictures. Again, no misrepresentation.
Your trigger finger for blaming the seller for something out of their control quite frankly indicates the lack of patience and sense of entitlement that we see from several people new to the hobby. Especially those that go after big money items right away and get stuck on graded items.
You may be a great guy, but your handling of this incident honestly shows your experience level in the hobby.
As for the U grading, while it is a relief that you won't actively U grade an item yourself, you really should stay away from buying them already U graded as well. As I said before, there is not one difference between a U graded item and a regular graded one with the same grade, except someone destroyed a packaged item to get the former (and I suppose the inconsistencies in AFA grading, which you will see for yourself sooner than later). Buying those encourages the practice, and shows the U graders there is a market for it, so inadvertently, you are still lending a hand to the problem.
If you frequent the Facebook groups and let it be known you support U graded items, you will be removed and banned from most of them. Same with many online forums. At a minimum, U grade collectors are often met with derision in the community, which will frustrate you when you find only a limited number of people willing to sell to you.
Education is the most important thing to acquire in this hobby. More so than the items themselves. You'll be better off for it, and will last longer if you take it slow and learn things for yourself, as the hotshots who drop money for instant collections rarely have any staying power.
Ian