edd_jedi said:
Another variant rant. Just saw a post where somebody is asking why his "family 2" Han Bespin has a different head sculpt from another family 2 Han he has.
BECAUSE IT'S ALL MADE UP BULLSHIT! :lol:
Edd, Surely you're in danger here of insinuating stuff like Psybertech's Leia bespin mould research, General Khan's Luke Bespin mould research or Eddie-Dan Gerous' DSC analysis is a load of tosh. Yes, they are 'niche', But that's kind of the point I think & they are very valuable, in-depth guides.
If the guy asking about the Han Bespin head got further intrigued by the responses he gets from his original inquiry and went on to produce an in depth analysis of that one figures moulds and produced a detailed limelight, Then surely that could only be a good thing for the hobby?
There's a place in the hobby for everyone (Well, Everyone who isn't an obvious tit/scammer :lol: ), Beit high end collecting of rare cardbacks or just plain old army building of beaters.
A lot of FB posts annoy me too, But a question about different head moulds appearing on the same family COO is the kind of question I asked on forums 5/6 years ago, and the replies and answers generated in the thread proved invaluable for me. Look back through the forums and you can see experienced SW collectors asking each other the same things well over a decade ago.
I would never want to see someone on FB stopped from talking about mould differences or whatever, I'd just rather see the same question asked on a forum where the information and findings would remain.
I guess I'm in the 'other corner' on this one, so I'm merely airing an alternative viewpoint to the original point.
Neil