Andyclarke said:I'm sorry Darren but it does come across as a bit arrogant and selfish, don't you think?
Just my opinion.
palitoyjunky said:8) Well I am glad u have finally come on to say ur piece Darren after just closely studying our forum :!:
Bit of a passive aggressive response don't u think :!: Coming on here and implying we r bullshit Palitoy experts by ur " " marks. I have never said I am a Palitoy expert nor has the others U r referring to! We all just have a passion for Palitoy and I for one am always learning and always willing to help out fellow collectors if indeed I can.
U say u thought we were friends, our relationship over the years has been nothing more than dealer, collector and will say no more on that :!: Don't get me wrong I know u r a good dealer with a good rep etc and ur existence as such for so many years is testament to that so I cannot knock u on ur dealership qualities. "Starzone Toys" is great for the hobby 8)
U say ur a shy guy and not one to show off ur collection. U have shown enough of it on FB-a far more vast stage than our little Forum. As u say u were also heavily involved in the Palitoy Archive Room in 2007 at Cel showing some top pieces and displays in ur collection and it was great to see. U also soon put up ur 2 30 back A&B examples of FX-7 when the Vectis example sold for 8.68K(after fees). So please don't say ur shy mate :!:
I guess I can understand u not wishing to show me ur Dengar-not being my friend why should u :?: If u do have it many congrats and I genuinely hope to c a Palitoy book written one day-that would b amazing
U can even charge me double if u like :lol:
Anyway as u say this is getting a little tedious now. U have said ur piece and I have said mine. I won't b mentioning the 41 Dengar and u in the same sentence again. But I would love to c an example one day and the 30 back Luke original wouldn't go a miss either :wink:
Anyway onwards and upwards.
Starzone said:Andyclarke said:I'm sorry Darren but it does come across as a bit arrogant and selfish, don't you think?
Just my opinion.
I don't think people I'm friends with would ever call me selfish and arrogant but if that's what certain people want to think of me I'm cool with that .....trust me I've been called a lot worse.
Mr-shifter said:Hey Darren,
If your swapping peeks for beers in Orlando I will see you at the bar
mr_palitoy said:And there are 3 known chewie 30bs now. The MOC you displayed and 2 cardbacks.
Cheers Jason
Lee Gregory said:Still don't see the issue of not posting a pic for all to see, everyone knows that Darren will not be selling it, so why not just prove it's existence by putting a pic on the forum ???
I'm sorry Jason but that doesn't prove anything to me....
mr_palitoy said:Lee Gregory said:Still don't see the issue of not posting a pic for all to see, everyone knows that Darren will not be selling it, so why not just prove it's existence by putting a pic on the forum ???
I'm sorry Jason but that doesn't prove anything to me....
Then you can ignore the whole matrix then. As the entries on it are all verified in a similar manner.
Jason
mr_palitoy said:Lee Gregory said:Still don't see the issue of not posting a pic for all to see, everyone knows that Darren will not be selling it, so why not just prove it's existence by putting a pic on the forum ???
I'm sorry Jason but that doesn't prove anything to me....
Then you can ignore the whole matrix then. As the entries on it are all verified in a similar manner.
Jason
Starzone said:Andyclarke said:I'm sorry Darren but it does come across as a bit arrogant and selfish, don't you think?
Just my opinion.
I don't think people I'm friends with would ever call me selfish and arrogant but if that's what certain people want to think of me I'm cool with that .....trust me I've been called a lot worse.
80s_collector said:Number one rule....take no **** off nobody..... hahaha
maxf said:mr_palitoy said:Lee Gregory said:Still don't see the issue of not posting a pic for all to see, everyone knows that Darren will not be selling it, so why not just prove it's existence by putting a pic on the forum ???
I'm sorry Jason but that doesn't prove anything to me....
Then you can ignore the whole matrix then. As the entries on it are all verified in a similar manner.
Jason
Don't be silly - only a few entries are verified in that way. Didn't the matrix used to have a separate entry for 'reported to exist', or has that been wiped out?